Lol was lookin for this thread I thought it was deleted like video I posted on aus bf.
Please refrain from the off topic personal attacks, it's not the intention of this post to belittle/frame any individuals/clans, it's something I thought is just 'sad' in terms of the competitive scene standards.
- lylow wrote:
- Here everyone is entitled to their opinion. You can have yours and I can have mine.
Is definitely a good start.
- lylow wrote:
- But to get the scores you do, and at the RATE you do - I cry foul. In two separate rounds last night, you outscored the combined total of 2 very good players by more than double.
You sir are 4 or 5 times better than the next higly rated gamer! If you kept up your pace, in the time it takes me to get 25 kills you would have single handedly won 2 entire matches of SQDM all by yourself. This simply is not normal.
Normal ? definitely not.
'Rate' is the keyword here
What you regard as '2 very good players' may not be what I regard as 'good players'
A good player does not have a bad day, because a good player is good at what they do, when you're bad on a certain day, you are not yet good.
A good player is consistent, because as a good player, you know how to play the game well, if you somehow choked on a day, you have not yet learnt to play the game well.
These are not some quoted lines to make me look like a preacher, it's something I tell myself, all the time, at all times. I don't give myself excuses when I lose in a match, I tell myself, 'you're not good enough' - regardless what happened. Applied in the right context with the right mindset, it will motivate you become a better player instead of a whiner.
Back to the quote:
However many times I may be better than what you regard as a good player has got nothing to do with one's legitimacy; it only lowers your own standards, and the clan's as an overall ( sure, noone here's know's anyone's legitimacy, but still worth saying ).
- BULLBAR wrote:
- I have played this game for a while now. I have learnt that some days I’m on it and it seems easy to kill people. On other days I seem to put all my bullets into guys and they don’t drop. This boils down to one obvious thing latency. Lag in this game seem to be variable even from game to game. I think this plays a huge factor in how accurate you are. I have heard that Steinerz has a very high end PC which also leads me to believe you have a very stable internet connection and you obviously know a lot about PC’s to spend so much money on them.
If you are legitimate Steinerz this must be the only explanation to how you are about 50% more accurate and faster to the kill than the next best player.
Well well, back to hardwares, I beg to differ. Let me start of by saying you're misinformed. I don't know much about PC considering how much there is to know, however, I'm an 3d visual effects artist, such a rig is needed for what I do.
Anyhow, as good as a computer may be, there's a certain threshold where the difference in gaming experience start to diminish.
A quick example would be
my dual xeon W5590 3.3ghz + quadrofx4800 / gtx 295 vs stock any i7 900 series + gtx 295/480/580 - there wouldn't be much difference at all, if not worse than the latter.
bc2 just like most games utilizes GPU 95% if not more of the end result what you're seeing on screen. CPU does the initial and overtime processing of running the game + any other secondaries that has been specifically coded to be computed by ur CPU.
As for gaming performance being oriented to hardware performance, surely, I believe in that, I have lived several years with a really crappy gaming rig. However, despite my shitty computer that used to drop to 20-30 fps in cs source engine, I managed to pull off being one of the best if not the best cs player, particularly that year of crappy computer 2005.
- BULLBAR wrote:
I purposefully put myself to the far edges of the map, right away from the main Rush objectives. I kept myself hidden in a bush with a Ghillie on for a few minutes waiting to see if you would shoot me. While keeping an eye on your kill activity, you were as always raping our team. But it was obvious you had not seen me……… YET, then as I knew you would, bang I’m dead. So I’m sitting there doing absolutely nothing no one on your team has seen me. I’m away from the main objective but you manage to see me and head shot me. This leads me to ask 2 questions. Why did you bother to look over to the very edge of the map where there was no movement? How did you see me in that bush?
Nothing special/unusual here, without trying to offend you, I regard your question as abit 'amateurish' to me.
If you truly have played enough with me on the same squad, you would probably have noticed my 2 main yet majorly different playstyles. One is offensive + aggressive, which is mostly what I do, rush, be it defender or attacker, to the enemy's spawn point and take advantage of the deviated centre of action. This is where I get most of my kills.
The second is passive offensive and something I'd imagine would've happened to you; I'd rush as usual, and establish at a comfortable spot. I always do double spotting; first unscoped just to get an overall view of the field in front of me, then pin point spot by zooming in, as iSnipe already mentioned, good players ( not just snipers ) would know camping spots all over the map.
Checking every single corner is a simple rule I've carried from cs where it's one of the basics to do, and yet I get random noobs who tell me 'omg how'd u know I was there ? fkn wallhaxor!'; which is just simply stupid.
- BULLBAR wrote:
You have to admit mate when looking at your stats and comparing them with guys that are good players in this game they smell bad. Even when comparing your stats with known hackers your stats still smell a bit wiffy. I think you are one of the fastest plays to rank 50 in the world by a long way.
After reading this I got curious and had a look at the worlds leaderboards. I looked at the first few top on the leaderboards ( which do not necessarily represent best players, as better players may not have spend as much time and/or gained as much points as some other people who sits in front of BF everyday ).
But just for a fun fact;
I picked the current no.2 player - filthy moga because he has a decent K/D, actually identical to mine.
he has spent 1535 hours, gaining a total score of ~22,564,948
I have spent 452 hours, gaining a total score of ~11,167,188
doing a simple math without much considerations factored in, doubling my hours and rounded up to 1000 hours would put me somewhere on ~20,000,000 - ~22,000,000 ( remember that I dont have as many unlocks/achievements so the xp graph is not as steep ).
Nothing I can conclude from here, just an observation for fun, there's probably much better players on the other pages.
- BULLBAR wrote:
Steinerz I really want to believe you are as good as you are without any dodgyness, but from what I have seen so far it is really hard mate.
Rule of relativity applies here, as lylow already mentioned, just because someone is better than you, it is not necessary that they hack.
Until you learn how it's done, I'm afraid there's nothing I can do to convince you otherwise, and was not the intention of my post.
I'm not here to prove anything, as much as I hate sounding arrogant here, simply put; a clan regarded as one of the best, calling me hack, is a disgrace to the australian competitive battlefield scene ( is the standards really that low ?
).
- BULLBAR wrote:
Isnipe OMG mate! Sitting back camping and using one weapon and tactic constantly just to rake up kills is not how this game was intended to be played.
On his defense, I've played quite a few with iSnipe, he rushes with his sniper rifle alot, much like I do, I don't know how he spends his time when not playing with me
.
He knows how to rush, he gets his kills and he does it exceptionally well, something I haven't seen from anyone else I know of around.
- BULLBAR wrote:
If that’s all any of us did was snipe for hundreds of hours we would all be a lot better at it than you.
I heavily doubt on that and I'll bet my money for a side little fun
.
But hey competition is good just keep it healthy, personal attacks are totally unnecessary.
Just imagine yourself ( which may be or may not be a good player, whatever the case, being accused of hacking ) what would you do ? wouldn't you laugh at how stupid the other end is and would love to give them a good slap in the face and show them what reality is ? that's exactly what is happening here ;-).
- lylow wrote:
Unfortunately I can never know, and Steinerz Im truly not that plagued by personal concern that I feel the need to meet up with you and watch you game in order to learn the truth. I dont know you, and you could easily be a truly decent bloke. But there isnt any need to take one gamers opinion to heart unless you value my opinion with such high regard.
This was never about me caring what your accusations mean, they don't mean much to me other than feeling bad about the competitive scene. Being a competitive person/player, it's all about challenge, proving myself may be a challenge, because I'm keen to see the end result. Knowing that, be sure to challenge me any day any time :-).
And finally, all of these talks will remain as talks, it's a pity that battlefield does not have a built in LAN mode/ LAN competitive scene and/or first person view cam to spectate.
There's nothing more you can ask than someone who can prove it, have done it, and want to verse you on LAN.